Afghanistan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Afghanistan
-1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Democratic Republic of Congo
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
192nd
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
190th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
-2.5-2-1.5-1199620102025

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 192nd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 190th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1990s -2.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Afghanistan
2020s -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Afghanistan or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Afghanistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Afghanistan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Afghanistan ranks 192nd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 190th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/congo-dem-rep/">Afghanistan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.