Latvia vs Monaco: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps
Latvia
1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Monaco
1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Latvia rank
32nd
Monaco rank
30th
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 32nd and Monaco ranks 30th of 205 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3433 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps, Latvia or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps between Latvia and Monaco?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Monaco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Monaco rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 32nd and Monaco ranks 30th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) with 543 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.