Comoros vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality
Comoros
-1.36
in 2011
Zimbabwe
-1.9
in 2011
Comoros rank
48th
Zimbabwe rank
51st
Regulatory Quality over time
- Comoros
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Comoros currently reports -1.36 against -1.9 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Comoros ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.21 | -0.8849 | 0.3286 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | -1.44 | -2 | 0.5604 | Comoros |
| 2010s | -1.39 | -1.96 | 0.5709 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Comoros or Zimbabwe?
- Comoros, at -1.36 against -1.9 in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 0.54, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Comoros and Zimbabwe rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Comoros ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory quality measures the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development. Further documentation and research using the World Governance Indicators (WGI) is available at www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance.