Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Sri Lanka
3
in 2018
Zimbabwe
3
in 2018
Sri Lanka rank
61st
Zimbabwe rank
61st
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Sri Lanka
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3 against 3 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.8 | 3.3 | 0.5 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 3 | 3.9 | 0.9 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
- Sri Lanka, at 3 against 3 in Zimbabwe as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).