Philippines vs South Africa: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Philippines
- South Africa
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 2 against 2 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 78 shared years of data; in 1935 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 5 | 4 | 1 | Philippines |
| 1940s | 3.29 | 4 | 0.7143 | South Africa |
| 1950s | 3 | 4 | 1 | South Africa |
| 1960s | 3 | 4 | 1 | South Africa |
| 1970s | 3.8 | 4 | 0.2 | South Africa |
| 1980s | 3 | 4 | 1 | South Africa |
| 1990s | 2 | 2.25 | 0.25 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Philippines or South Africa?
- Philippines, at 2 against 2 in South Africa as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Philippines and South Africa?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and South Africa?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1935 to 2018.
- How do Philippines and South Africa rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Philippines ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 110th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).