North Macedonia vs Paraguay: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Paraguay
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 2 against 2 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 90 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Paraguay ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 110th and Paraguay ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 5 and Paraguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 2.22 | 3 | 0.7778 | Paraguay |
| 1930s | 4.12 | 3.12 | 1 | North Macedonia |
| 1940s | 4.17 | 3.5 | 0.6667 | North Macedonia |
| 1950s | 4 | 3.75 | 0.25 | North Macedonia |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 3.8 | 0.2 | North Macedonia |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2 | 0.1 | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 2 | 2.33 | 0.3333 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, North Macedonia or Paraguay?
- North Macedonia, at 2 against 2 in Paraguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 90 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do North Macedonia and Paraguay rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- North Macedonia ranks 110th and Paraguay ranks 110th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).