Myanmar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Myanmar
2
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago
2
in 2018
Myanmar rank
110th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
110th
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Myanmar
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 110th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 2 | 2 | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 4 | 2 | 2 | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 3.8 | 2.9 | 0.9 | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 4 | 2.5 | 1.5 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 4 | 2 | 2 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 2.75 | 2 | 0.75 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Myanmar or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Myanmar, at 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Myanmar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
- How do Myanmar and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Myanmar ranks 110th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).