Guinea-Bissau vs Russian Federation: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 3 against 3 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 61st and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2.62 | 2.5 | 0.125 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 2.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Guinea-Bissau or Russian Federation?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 3 against 3 in Russian Federation as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2018.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 61st and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).