Guatemala vs Jordan: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Guatemala
3
in 2018
Jordan
3
in 2018
Guatemala rank
61st
Jordan rank
61st
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Guatemala
- Jordan
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 3 against 3 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 72 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | 4 | 1 | Guatemala |
| 1950s | 3.4 | 3.1 | 0.3 | Guatemala |
| 1960s | 2.6 | 4 | 1.4 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 3 | 4 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 2.89 | 3.89 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 2.44 | 3 | 0.5556 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Guatemala or Jordan?
- Guatemala, at 3 against 3 in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Guatemala and Jordan?
- 0, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Jordan?
- 72 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2018.
- How do Guatemala and Jordan rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Guatemala ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).