Equatorial Guinea vs United Arab Emirates: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Equatorial Guinea
4
in 2018
United Arab Emirates
4
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea rank
34th
United Arab Emirates rank
34th
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4 against 4 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 48 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and United Arab Emirates ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Equatorial Guinea or United Arab Emirates?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 4 against 4 in United Arab Emirates as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Equatorial Guinea and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and United Arab Emirates?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2018.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and United Arab Emirates ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).