Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Equatorial Guinea
4
in 2018
Saudi Arabia
4
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea rank
34th
Saudi Arabia rank
34th
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4 against 4 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and Saudi Arabia ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3 | 4 | 1 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Equatorial Guinea or Saudi Arabia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 4 against 4 in Saudi Arabia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and Saudi Arabia ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).