Ecuador vs Guinea-Bissau: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Ecuador
3
in 2018
Guinea-Bissau
3
in 2018
Ecuador rank
61st
Guinea-Bissau rank
61st
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Ecuador
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 3 against 3 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
Across all 43 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 61st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.83 | 4 | 1.17 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1980s | 2 | 4 | 2 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1990s | 2 | 2.62 | 0.625 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 2 | 2.1 | 0.1 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 2.67 | 3 | 0.3333 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Ecuador or Guinea-Bissau?
- Ecuador, at 3 against 3 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Ecuador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2018.
- How do Ecuador and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Ecuador ranks 61st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).