Dominican Republic vs Jordan: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Jordan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 3 against 3 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 68 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Jordan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 3.1 | 0.9 | Dominican Republic |
| 1960s | 3.2 | 4 | 0.8 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 2.8 | 4 | 1.2 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 2 | 3.9 | 1.9 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 2.33 | 3 | 0.6667 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Dominican Republic or Jordan?
- Dominican Republic, at 3 against 3 in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Dominican Republic and Jordan?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Jordan?
- 68 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Jordan rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).