Czechia vs Honduras: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Czechia
2
in 2018
Honduras
2
in 2018
Czechia rank
110th
Honduras rank
110th
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Czechia
- Honduras
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2 against 2 in Honduras, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 88 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Honduras ahead.
Czechia ranks 110th and Honduras ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 6 and Honduras in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Honduras |
| 1920s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Honduras |
| 1930s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Honduras |
| 1940s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 3 | 1 | Czechia |
| 1960s | 4 | 3 | 1 | Czechia |
| 1970s | 4 | 2.9 | 1.1 | Czechia |
| 1980s | 4 | 2 | 2 | Czechia |
| 1990s | 4.1 | 2 | 2.1 | Czechia |
| 2000s | 3.8 | 2 | 1.8 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Czechia or Honduras?
- Czechia, at 2 against 2 in Honduras as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Czechia and Honduras?
- 0, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Honduras?
- 88 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do Czechia and Honduras rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Czechia ranks 110th and Honduras ranks 110th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).