Croatia vs El Salvador: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Croatia
2
in 2018
El Salvador
2
in 2018
Croatia rank
110th
El Salvador rank
110th
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Croatia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 2 against 2 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 82 shared years of data; in 1921 it was El Salvador ahead.
Croatia ranks 110th and El Salvador ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 6 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 2.22 | 4 | 1.78 | El Salvador |
| 1930s | 4.12 | 4 | 0.125 | Croatia |
| 1940s | 4.25 | 4 | 0.25 | Croatia |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 2.9 | 1.1 | Croatia |
| 1970s | 4 | 3.22 | 0.7778 | Croatia |
| 1980s | 4 | 2 | 2 | Croatia |
| 1990s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Croatia or El Salvador?
- Croatia, at 2 against 2 in El Salvador as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Croatia and El Salvador?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and El Salvador?
- 82 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Croatia and El Salvador rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Croatia ranks 110th and El Salvador ranks 110th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).