Congo vs Dominican Republic: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Congo
3
in 2018
Dominican Republic
3
in 2018
Congo rank
61st
Dominican Republic rank
61st
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Congo
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3 against 3 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Congo ranks 61st and Dominican Republic ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.8 | 3.2 | 0.6 | Congo |
| 1970s | 4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | Congo |
| 1980s | 4 | 2 | 2 | Congo |
| 1990s | 3.44 | 2 | 1.44 | Congo |
| 2000s | 3.1 | 2 | 1.1 | Congo |
| 2010s | 3 | 2.33 | 0.6667 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Congo or Dominican Republic?
- Congo, at 3 against 3 in Dominican Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Congo and Dominican Republic?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Dominican Republic?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Congo and Dominican Republic rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Congo ranks 61st and Dominican Republic ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).