Central African Republic vs Jordan: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Jordan
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 3 against 3 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Jordan ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 3.9 | 0.1 | Central African Republic |
| 1990s | 2.6 | 2.2 | 0.4 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 2.5 | 2.3 | 0.2 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Central African Republic or Jordan?
- Central African Republic, at 3 against 3 in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Central African Republic and Jordan?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Jordan?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Central African Republic and Jordan rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Central African Republic ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).