Cambodia vs Central African Republic: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Cambodia
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 3 against 3 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Cambodia ranks 61st and Central African Republic ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Central African Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 3.5 | 4 | 0.5 | Central African Republic |
| 1990s | 3.14 | 2 | 1.14 | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.5 | 0.5 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Cambodia or Central African Republic?
- Cambodia, at 3 against 3 in Central African Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Cambodia and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Central African Republic?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Cambodia and Central African Republic rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Cambodia ranks 61st and Central African Republic ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).