Botswana vs United Kingdom: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Botswana
2
in 2018
United Kingdom
2
in 2018
Botswana rank
110th
United Kingdom rank
110th
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Botswana
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 2 against 2 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 53 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 110th and United Kingdom ranks 110th of 167 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 5 | 3 | United Kingdom |
| 1970s | 2 | 5 | 3 | United Kingdom |
| 1980s | 2 | 5 | 3 | United Kingdom |
| 1990s | 2 | 5 | 3 | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 2 | 5 | 3 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 2 | 4 | 2 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Botswana or United Kingdom?
- Botswana, at 2 against 2 in United Kingdom as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Botswana and United Kingdom?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and United Kingdom?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
- How do Botswana and United Kingdom rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Botswana ranks 110th and United Kingdom ranks 110th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).