Bangladesh vs Russian Federation: Regulation of Political Participation Score
Bangladesh
3
in 2018
Russian Federation
3
in 2018
Bangladesh rank
61st
Russian Federation rank
61st
Regulation of Political Participation Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 3 against 3 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.
Across all 47 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 61st and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.25 | 4 | 0.75 | Russian Federation |
| 1980s | 3.8 | 4 | 0.2 | Russian Federation |
| 1990s | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.2 | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulation of political participation score, Bangladesh or Russian Federation?
- Bangladesh, at 3 against 3 in Russian Federation as of 2018.
- What is the difference in regulation of political participation score between Bangladesh and Russian Federation?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Russian Federation?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2018.
- How do Bangladesh and Russian Federation rank globally for regulation of political participation score?
- Bangladesh ranks 61st and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Regulation of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is regulated, ranging from highly unstable political participation (score of 1), over political participation with multiple identities (score of 2), sectarian political participation (score of 3), and restricted political participation (score of 4), to unrestricted and stable political participation (score of 5).