Croatia vs New Zealand: Receipts and expenditure — International tourism receipts
Receipts and expenditure — International tourism receipts over time
- Croatia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 17,233 National currency against 15,223 National currency in Croatia, a difference of 2,010 National currency.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was New Zealand ahead.
Croatia ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7,787 National currency | 12,074 National currency | 4,287 National currency | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 11,476 National currency | 9,541 National currency | 1,935 National currency | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher receipts and expenditure — international tourism receipts, Croatia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 17,233 National currency against 15,223 National currency in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in receipts and expenditure — international tourism receipts between Croatia and New Zealand?
- 2,010 National currency, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and New Zealand rank globally for receipts and expenditure — international tourism receipts?
- Croatia ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Receipts and expenditure — International tourism receipts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
EBOPS 2010 classification for: 2008-onwards: OECD Members EBOPS 2002 methodology for: 2008-09: Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israël, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden, Turkey. 2008-12: Finland, France, Iceland, Slovak Republic, Spain 2008-11: Ireland