Luxembourg vs New Zealand: Receipts and expenditure — International tourism expenditure
Receipts and expenditure — International tourism expenditure over time
- Luxembourg
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 7,671 National currency against 5,208 National currency in Luxembourg, a difference of 2,463 National currency.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was New Zealand ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 26th of 35 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,278 National currency | 5,337 National currency | 3,060 National currency | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 3,778 National currency | 4,404 National currency | 625.68 National currency | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher receipts and expenditure — international tourism expenditure, Luxembourg or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 7,671 National currency against 5,208 National currency in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in receipts and expenditure — international tourism expenditure between Luxembourg and New Zealand?
- 2,463 National currency, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and New Zealand rank globally for receipts and expenditure — international tourism expenditure?
- Luxembourg ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 26th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Receipts and expenditure — International tourism expenditure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
EBOPS 2010 classification for: 2008-onwards: OECD Members EBOPS 2002 methodology for: 2008-09: Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israël, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden, Turkey. 2008-12: Finland, France, Iceland, Slovak Republic, Spain 2008-11: Ireland