Chile vs South Africa: Real median earnings per hour, aged 15-64, deflated to 2010 and PPP
Chile
0.0465
in 2017
South Africa
0.0439
in 2020
Chile rank
28th
South Africa rank
30th
Real median earnings per hour, aged 15-64, deflated to 2010 and PPP over time
- Chile
- South Africa
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0465 against 0.0439 in South Africa, a difference of 0.0026.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 30th of 67 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0355 | 0.0182 | 0.0173 | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0453 | 0.0536 | 0.0083 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher real median earnings per hour, aged 15-64, deflated to 2010 and ppp, Chile or South Africa?
- Chile, at 0.0465 against 0.0439 in South Africa as of 2017.
- What is the difference in real median earnings per hour, aged 15-64, deflated to 2010 and ppp between Chile and South Africa?
- 0.0026, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for real median earnings per hour, aged 15-64, deflated to 2010 and ppp?
- Chile ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 30th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Real median earnings per hour, aged 15-64, deflated to 2010 and PPP adjusted, above primary education. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.