Malawi vs Tunisia: Real Effective Exchange Rate

Malawi
76.76
in 2018
Tunisia
78.7
in 2018
Malawi rank
98th
Tunisia rank
97th

Real Effective Exchange Rate over time

  • Malawi
  • Tunisia
050100150200020092018

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 78.7 against 76.76 in Malawi, a difference of 1.94.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 97th of 107 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 114.52 115.52 0.9973 Tunisia
2010s 78.57 92.61 14.03 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real effective exchange rate, Malawi or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 78.7 against 76.76 in Malawi as of 2018.
What is the difference in real effective exchange rate between Malawi and Tunisia?
1.94, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for real effective exchange rate?
Malawi ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 97th of 107 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank staff calculations based on Datastream and IMF International Finance Statistics data, published as Real Effective Exchange Rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Real Effective Exchange Rate
Source
World Bank staff calculations based on Datastream and IMF International Finance Statistics data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
117 places, 2,839 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed

Real effective exchange rate is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a currency against a weighted average of several foreign currencies) divided by a price deflator or index of costs.