Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Papua New Guinea: Real Effective Exchange Rate

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
123.86
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
120.86
in 2018
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
11th
Papua New Guinea rank
14th

Real Effective Exchange Rate over time

  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
  • Papua New Guinea
050100150199420092024

How they compare

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 123.86 against 120.86 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 3.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 14th of 107 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 119.98 87.84 32.15 Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2010s 106.98 119.93 12.94 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real effective exchange rate, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Papua New Guinea?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 123.86 against 120.86 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in real effective exchange rate between Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Papua New Guinea?
3, with Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Papua New Guinea?
19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Papua New Guinea rank globally for real effective exchange rate?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 14th of 107 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank staff calculations based on Datastream and IMF International Finance Statistics data, published as Real Effective Exchange Rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Papua New Guinea: Real Effective Exchange Rate. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank staff calculations based on Datastream and IMF International Finance Statistics data. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/papua-new-guinea/">Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Papua New Guinea: Real Effective Exchange Rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real Effective Exchange Rate
Source
World Bank staff calculations based on Datastream and IMF International Finance Statistics data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
117 places, 2,839 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed

Real effective exchange rate is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a currency against a weighted average of several foreign currencies) divided by a price deflator or index of costs.