Mauritius vs Namibia: Rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes
Mauritius
3.94
in 2023
Namibia
3.55
in 2023
Mauritius rank
53rd
Namibia rank
55th
Rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 3.94 against 3.55 in Namibia, a difference of 0.39.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 55th of 173 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.71 | 5.19 | 3.48 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2.1 | 3.58 | 1.48 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 2.32 | 3.84 | 1.52 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 3.94 against 3.55 in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0.39, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes?
- Mauritius ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 55th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.