Japan vs Timor-Leste: Rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes
Japan
0.35
in 2023
Timor-Leste
0.3
in 2023
Japan rank
131st
Timor-Leste rank
133rd
Rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes over time
- Japan
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.35 against 0.3 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.05.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Timor-Leste's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Japan ranks 131st and Timor-Leste ranks 133rd of 172 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 0.6771 | 0.6771 | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 0.2275 | 0.2 | 0.0275 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes, Japan or Timor-Leste?
- Japan, at 0.35 against 0.3 in Timor-Leste as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes between Japan and Timor-Leste?
- 0.05, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Timor-Leste?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Timor-Leste rank globally for rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes?
- Japan ranks 131st and Timor-Leste ranks 133rd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Rate of acute flaccid paralysis from non polio causes. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.