Australia vs Latvia: Public sector employment, as a share of paid employment by location
Australia
0.236
in 2015
Latvia
0.2356
in 2018
Australia rank
47th
Latvia rank
48th
Public sector employment, as a share of paid employment by location over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.236 against 0.2356 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0004.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 48th of 69 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3164 | 0.2272 | 0.0892 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.2555 | 0.2348 | 0.0207 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher public sector employment, as a share of paid employment by location, Australia or Latvia?
- Australia, at 0.236 against 0.2356 in Latvia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in public sector employment, as a share of paid employment by location between Australia and Latvia?
- 0.0004, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for public sector employment, as a share of paid employment by location?
- Australia ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 48th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Public sector employment, as a share of paid employment by location: Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.