Philippines vs Zambia: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Philippines
30 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Zambia
30 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Philippines rank
72nd
Zambia rank
72nd
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Philippines
- Zambia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 30 DB15-20 methodology against 30 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 72nd and Zambia ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Philippines or Zambia?
- Philippines, at 30 DB15-20 methodology against 30 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Philippines and Zambia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zambia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Zambia rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Philippines ranks 72nd and Zambia ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.