Papua New Guinea vs Philippines: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Philippines
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 30 DB15-20 methodology against 30 DB15-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 72nd and Philippines ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Papua New Guinea or Philippines?
- Papua New Guinea, at 30 DB15-20 methodology against 30 DB15-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Philippines rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 72nd and Philippines ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.