New Zealand vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
New Zealand
43 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
43 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
3rd
Singapore rank
3rd
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 43 DB15-20 methodology against 43 DB15-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 43 DB15-20 methodology against 43 DB15-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- New Zealand ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.