Mongolia vs Sweden: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Mongolia
37 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
36 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Mongolia rank
25th
Sweden rank
28th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Mongolia
- Sweden
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 37 DB15-20 methodology against 36 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 1 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sweden ahead.
Mongolia ranks 25th and Sweden ranks 28th of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Mongolia or Sweden?
- Mongolia, at 37 DB15-20 methodology against 36 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Mongolia and Sweden?
- 1 DB15-20 methodology, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Sweden rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Mongolia ranks 25th and Sweden ranks 28th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.