Republic of Moldova vs Peru: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Peru
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 34 DB15-20 methodology against 34 DB15-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 45th and Peru ranks 45th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Republic of Moldova or Peru?
- Republic of Moldova, at 34 DB15-20 methodology against 34 DB15-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Republic of Moldova and Peru?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Peru?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Peru rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 45th and Peru ranks 45th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.