Mauritius vs Norway: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Mauritius
39 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Norway
38 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius rank
18th
Norway rank
21st
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Mauritius
- Norway
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 39 DB15-20 methodology against 38 DB15-20 methodology in Norway, a difference of 1 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Norway ahead.
Mauritius ranks 18th and Norway ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Mauritius or Norway?
- Mauritius, at 39 DB15-20 methodology against 38 DB15-20 methodology in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Mauritius and Norway?
- 1 DB15-20 methodology, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Mauritius ranks 18th and Norway ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.