Latvia vs Peru: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Latvia
34 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Peru
34 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia rank
45th
Peru rank
45th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Latvia
- Peru
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 34 DB15-20 methodology against 34 DB15-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 45th and Peru ranks 45th of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Latvia or Peru?
- Latvia, at 34 DB15-20 methodology against 34 DB15-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Latvia and Peru?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Peru rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Latvia ranks 45th and Peru ranks 45th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.