Kiribati vs Solomon Islands: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Kiribati
19 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Solomon Islands
19 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Kiribati rank
137th
Solomon Islands rank
137th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Kiribati
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 19 DB15-20 methodology against 19 DB15-20 methodology in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 137th and Solomon Islands ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Kiribati or Solomon Islands?
- Kiribati, at 19 DB15-20 methodology against 19 DB15-20 methodology in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Solomon Islands rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Kiribati ranks 137th and Solomon Islands ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.