Kenya vs New Zealand: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Kenya
- New Zealand
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 46 DB15-20 methodology against 43 DB15-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 3 DB15-20 methodology.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was New Zealand ahead.
Kenya ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Kenya or New Zealand?
- Kenya, at 46 DB15-20 methodology against 43 DB15-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Kenya and New Zealand?
- 3 DB15-20 methodology, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and New Zealand rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Kenya ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.