Kenya vs Malaysia: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Kenya
46 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
44 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Kenya rank
1st
Malaysia rank
2nd
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Kenya
- Malaysia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 46 DB15-20 methodology against 44 DB15-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 2 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Malaysia ahead.
Kenya ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Kenya or Malaysia?
- Kenya, at 46 DB15-20 methodology against 44 DB15-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Kenya and Malaysia?
- 2 DB15-20 methodology, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Malaysia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Malaysia rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Kenya ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.