Fiji vs Hungary: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Fiji
27 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Hungary
27 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Fiji rank
97th
Hungary rank
97th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Fiji
- Hungary
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 27 DB15-20 methodology against 27 DB15-20 methodology in Hungary, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Hungary ahead.
Fiji ranks 97th and Hungary ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Fiji or Hungary?
- Fiji, at 27 DB15-20 methodology against 27 DB15-20 methodology in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Fiji and Hungary?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Hungary?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Fiji and Hungary rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Fiji ranks 97th and Hungary ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.