Ethiopia vs Palau: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Ethiopia
5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Palau
7 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Ethiopia rank
190th
Palau rank
189th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Ethiopia
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 7 DB15-20 methodology against 5 DB15-20 methodology in Ethiopia, a difference of 2 DB15-20 methodology.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.4 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 190th and Palau ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Ethiopia or Palau?
- Palau, at 7 DB15-20 methodology against 5 DB15-20 methodology in Ethiopia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Ethiopia and Palau?
- 2 DB15-20 methodology, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Palau?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Palau rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Ethiopia ranks 190th and Palau ranks 189th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.