Estonia vs Nepal: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Estonia
29 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Nepal
29 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Estonia rank
79th
Nepal rank
79th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Estonia
- Nepal
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 29 DB15-20 methodology against 29 DB15-20 methodology in Nepal, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 79th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Estonia or Nepal?
- Estonia, at 29 DB15-20 methodology against 29 DB15-20 methodology in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Estonia and Nepal?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Nepal?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Nepal rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Estonia ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 79th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.