Estonia vs Malawi: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Estonia
29 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi
29 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Estonia rank
79th
Malawi rank
79th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Estonia
- Malawi
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 29 DB15-20 methodology against 29 DB15-20 methodology in Malawi, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 79th and Malawi ranks 79th of 191 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Estonia or Malawi?
- Estonia, at 29 DB15-20 methodology against 29 DB15-20 methodology in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Estonia and Malawi?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malawi?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Malawi rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Estonia ranks 79th and Malawi ranks 79th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.