Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
11 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
10 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
177th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
180th

Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.557.510201320162019

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 11 DB15-20 methodology against 10 DB15-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1 DB15-20 methodology.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 180th of 191 countries.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Sao Tome and Principe?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 11 DB15-20 methodology against 10 DB15-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Sao Tome and Principe?
1 DB15-20 methodology, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Sao Tome and Principe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 180th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-strength-of-minority-investor-protection-index-0-50-db15-20/congo-dem-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-strength-of-minority-investor-protection-index-0-50-db15-20/congo-dem-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.