China vs Iceland: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
China
36 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland
36 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
28th
Iceland rank
28th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- China
- Iceland
How they compare
China currently reports 36 DB15-20 methodology against 36 DB15-20 methodology in Iceland, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
China ranks 28th and Iceland ranks 28th of 191 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, China or Iceland?
- China, at 36 DB15-20 methodology against 36 DB15-20 methodology in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between China and Iceland?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iceland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do China and Iceland rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- China ranks 28th and Iceland ranks 28th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.