Chile vs Malta: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Chile
33 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta
33 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
51st
Malta rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Chile
- Malta
How they compare
Chile currently reports 33 DB15-20 methodology against 33 DB15-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 51st and Malta ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Chile or Malta?
- Chile, at 33 DB15-20 methodology against 33 DB15-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Chile and Malta?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malta?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Malta rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Chile ranks 51st and Malta ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.