Cameroon vs Suriname: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Cameroon
14 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Suriname
14 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Cameroon rank
158th
Suriname rank
158th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Cameroon
- Suriname
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 14 DB15-20 methodology against 14 DB15-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Cameroon or Suriname?
- Cameroon, at 14 DB15-20 methodology against 14 DB15-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Cameroon and Suriname?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Suriname rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Cameroon ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.