Bhutan vs Lebanon: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Bhutan
23 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Lebanon
22 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Bhutan rank
111th
Lebanon rank
114th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Bhutan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 23 DB15-20 methodology against 22 DB15-20 methodology in Lebanon, a difference of 1 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Lebanon ahead.
Bhutan ranks 111th and Lebanon ranks 114th of 191 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Bhutan or Lebanon?
- Bhutan, at 23 DB15-20 methodology against 22 DB15-20 methodology in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Bhutan and Lebanon?
- 1 DB15-20 methodology, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Lebanon?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Lebanon rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Bhutan ranks 111th and Lebanon ranks 114th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.