Australia vs Egypt: Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor
Australia
32 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Egypt
32 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
57th
Egypt rank
57th
Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor over time
- Australia
- Egypt
How they compare
Australia currently reports 32 DB15-20 methodology against 32 DB15-20 methodology in Egypt, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 57th and Egypt ranks 57th of 191 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor, Australia or Egypt?
- Australia, at 32 DB15-20 methodology against 32 DB15-20 methodology in Egypt as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor between Australia and Egypt?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Egypt?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Egypt rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of minority investor?
- Australia ranks 57th and Egypt ranks 57th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.