Hong Kong vs New Zealand: Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index

Hong Kong
27 DB06-14 methodology
in 2013
New Zealand
29 DB06-14 methodology
in 2013
Hong Kong rank
3rd
New Zealand rank
1st

Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index over time

  • Hong Kong
  • New Zealand
0102030200520092013

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 29 DB06-14 methodology against 27 DB06-14 methodology in Hong Kong, a difference of 2 DB06-14 methodology.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 1st of 191 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 27 DB06-14 methodology 29 DB06-14 methodology 2 DB06-14 methodology New Zealand
2010s 27 DB06-14 methodology 29 DB06-14 methodology 2 DB06-14 methodology New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of investor protection index, Hong Kong or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 29 DB06-14 methodology against 27 DB06-14 methodology in Hong Kong as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of investor protection index between Hong Kong and New Zealand?
2 DB06-14 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and New Zealand?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Hong Kong and New Zealand rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of investor protection index?
Hong Kong ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs New Zealand: Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-strength-of-investor-protection-index-0-10-db06-14/hong-kong-sar-china/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-strength-of-investor-protection-index-0-10-db06-14/hong-kong-sar-china/new-zealand/">Hong Kong vs New Zealand: Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)
Unit
DB06-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The strength of investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index and ease of shareholder suits index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.