How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Chinese Taipei?

9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Chinese Taipei: Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index

Chile

20 DB06-14 methodology

in 2013

Chinese Taipei

20 DB06-14 methodology

in 2013

Chile rank

23rd

Chinese Taipei rank

23rd

Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index over time

Chile
Chinese Taipei

How they compare

Chile currently reports 20 DB06-14 methodology against 20 DB06-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0 DB06-14 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 23rd and Chinese Taipei ranks 23rd of 191 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Chinese Taipei	Difference	Ahead
2000s	19 DB06-14 methodology	16 DB06-14 methodology	3 DB06-14 methodology	Chile
2010s	20 DB06-14 methodology	17.75 DB06-14 methodology	2.25 DB06-14 methodology	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors: strength of investor protection index, Chile or Chinese Taipei?: Chile, at 20 DB06-14 methodology against 20 DB06-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors: strength of investor protection index between Chile and Chinese Taipei?: 0 DB06-14 methodology, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Chinese Taipei?: 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Chile and Chinese Taipei rank globally for protecting minority investors: strength of investor protection index?: Chile ranks 23rd and Chinese Taipei ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Chinese Taipei: Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-strength-of-investor-protection-index-0-10-db06-14/chile/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-strength-of-investor-protection-index-0-10-db06-14/chile/taiwan/">Chile vs Chinese Taipei: Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)
Unit: DB06-14 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

The strength of investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index and ease of shareholder suits index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.